Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority refused the application on the grounds that the massing, scale, and form of the proposed front dormer would be unduly dominant and have a negative visual impact; however, the Inspector overturned this, concluding that the contemporary design is compatible with the permitted development and does not harm the character of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The existing variety of roof forms and extensions along Balally Drive diminishes the architectural uniformity of the street, allowing scope for contemporary design responses.
- The proposed dormer feature is architecturally consistent with the contemporary design of the previously approved extension and serves as a positive visual break in the pitched roof.
- The development is in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area and will not seriously injure the visual or residential amenities of the neighborhood.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.4(i) (Additional Accommodation in Existing Built-up Areas: Extensions to Dwellings)Chapter 8: Principles of DevelopmentLand Use Zoning Objective 'A' (To protect and-or improve residential amenity)
Decision Document Summary
This appeal relates to a proposed amendment to a previously approved planning permission at No. 20 Balally Drive, Dundrum. The proposal seeks to include a new single-storey extension at the first-floor level (a dormer feature) to the front of a dwelling currently undergoing redevelopment. Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Council refused permission, arguing that the dormer's scale would be unduly dominant and detract from the visual amenity of the public road. The Inspector, Robert Speer, reviewed t...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
View the appeal at An Bord Pleanála