Core Refusal Reason
The Inspector recommended granting permission, overturning the Planning Authority's refusal, on the basis that the applicant demonstrated a genuine locationally-specific need as a farm manager and that the proposal constitutes a legitimate replacement for a substandard existing dwelling, provided the original structure is demolished.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant has established a genuine economic and social need to reside on-site due to her role as manager of the adjoining farm and craft enterprise.
- The existing structure (Blackberry Lodge) is documented as being structurally substandard, damp, and beyond its intended lifespan, justifying the need for a replacement dwelling.
- While the applicants proposed retaining the original structure for office use, the Inspector concluded it must be demolished to prevent a proliferation of units and comply with rural housing policy regarding replacement dwellings.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy RES16Section 8.2.3.6Section 8.2.3.6 (iv)Section 8.2.3.6 (v)Policy Objective PHP23 (2022-2028 Plan)Section 12.3.11.4 (2022-2028 Plan)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal seeks to replace a 47 sq.m. timber-framed dwelling with a new 178 sq.m. two-story house on a site in Rathfarnham, Co. Dublin, zoned for agriculture and under strong urban influence. The site is part of a larger holding including a joinery, school, and petting farm. The Planning Authority initially refused permission, arguing that the applicant already had a residence and that the proposal would result in an unnecessary additional dwelling in a rural area. The Inspector, however, det...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP