3213/21

Permission sought for demolition of existing house, construction of a two storey five bedroom house, 379 sqm, widening of existing vehicular entrance, reduction of height of front boundary wall, reduction of existing ground levels and associated works.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed demolition of a habitable period house that contributes positively to a residential conservation area, to be replaced by a single dwelling of inappropriate massing and design without a net increase in density, is contrary to Dublin City Development Plan policies regarding sustainability and conservation.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The demolition of a habitable dwelling is not justified as it fails to provide a net increase in residential units and is contrary to Policy QH23 regarding the efficient use of urban land.
  • The existing 1920s/30s villa-style house makes a positive contribution to the architectural character of Eglinton Road and should be retained and refurbished in the interest of sustainable development.
  • The replacement dwelling, due to its two-storey height, significant massing, and extensive glazing, would be visually conspicuous and fail to integrate satisfactorily into the streetscape of the Z2 conservation area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy QH23Policy CHC4Section 14.8.2Section 16.10.17Policy CC1Policy CC3

Decision Document Summary

This report concerns an appeal against Dublin City Council's decision to refuse permission for the demolition of 'Eglinton Lodge', a detached 1920s villa-style house, and the construction of a new 379sqm two-storey, five-bedroom replacement dwelling. The site is located in a Residential Conservation Area (Z2 zoning). The applicant argued that the existing house is derelict, structurally compromised, and impossible to upgrade to modern energy standards. However, the Inspector concurred with the P...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP