D21B/0453

The Inspector recommended granting permission, overturning the Planning Authority's partial refusal, on the basis that the first-floor side extension is consistent with the established pattern of development in the area, does not create an undesirable terracing effect, and complies with the residential amenity standards of the Development Plan.

• The proposed first-floor extension is consistent with the evolving character of the streetscape, where similar side extensions have already been permitted, thereby not setting an undesirable precedent.
• The architectural design, featuring a lower ridge height and specific glazing treatment, ensures the extension integrates well into the existing dwelling and avoids a negative 'terracing' impact on the visual amenity of the area.
• The development is unlikely to cause significant injury to the residential amenities of neighboring properties in terms of overlooking or overshadowing and is compatible with the 'A' zoning objective to protect and improve residential amenity.