D25A/0592/WEB

Construction of new three storey 3 bedroom home on side garden. Main pitched ro

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The proposed development is on appropriately zoned urban land (Objective A), complies with the County Development Plan standards for corner/side garden sites, and respects the residential and visual amenities of the area without compromising traffic or pedestrian safety.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development is acceptable in principle under the 'A' zoning objective and aligns with national policies to increase residential density in established settlements through infill schemes.
  • Proposed separation distances, including a 22m gap to the rear boundary and 16.5m across the public road, are sufficient to prevent adverse overlooking, overshadowing, or overbearing impacts on neighboring properties.
  • A reduction in car parking from the recommended two spaces to one is justified given the infill nature of the site, the site's proximity to public transport, and the efficient use of a corner garden.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy Objective PHP18Policy Objective PHP19Section 12.3.7.5 (Corner/Side Garden Sites)Section 12.3.7.7Section 12.4.5.2 (Parking Deviations)Section 12.4.8.1 (Sliding Gates)Section 12.8.3.3 (Private Open Space)Table 12.5 (Car Parking Standards)Table 12.10 (Minimum Private Open Space)

Decision Document Summary

The proposal involves the construction of a three-storey, 158sqm detached house in the side garden of 'St. Anne's', a recently extended property at the junction of Killiney Road and Killiney Grove. The site context is a mature residential cul-de-sac. Eight third-party submissions and two subsequent appeals were lodged, primarily citing concerns over the house's scale, the use of orange/terracotta roof tiles, potential overlooking of 'Greeba' to the east, and traffic safety issues on the 5.5m wid...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP