Core Refusal Reason
The proposed amendments would undermine the cohesive design of the approved infill development and negatively impact the architectural quality and character of the streetscape.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The cumulative omission of architectural features, including chamfered corners and modest overhangs, results in a loss of architectural quality for the infill development.
- The proposed changes to the roof profile and front elevation finishes undermine the cohesive design approach previously established for the three-dwelling site.
- The development would be visually injurious to the established streetscape and fails to respect the character of the area, contravening specific development plan objectives.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective PM44Objective PM45
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought to amend an existing planning permission for a dwelling (House B) located at the site of the former 'Cuala' on Greenfield Road, Sutton. The proposal included modifications to the roof profile, front elevation finishes, and the removal of specific architectural details like chamfered corners and overhangs. The Planning Authority refused the application on the grounds that these changes would degrade the architectural integrity of a previously approved cohesive infill scheme. ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.