Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposal constitutes overdevelopment due to its excessive scale and height, which negatively impacts visual and residential amenities and sets an undesirable precedent.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The scale, design, and height of the structure relative to the existing dwelling represent overdevelopment on a restrictive site.
- The proposal would seriously injure the visual and residential amenities of the area and is contrary to proper planning and sustainable development.
- The development would set an undesirable precedent that would cumulatively erode the distinctive and attractive character of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application relates to River Cottage on Kinsealy Lane, Malahide, where the applicant proposed the removal of two timber sheds and associated works. The local authority issued a split decision, refusing permission for the proposed elements while granting retention for others. The refusal was primarily based on the excessive scale and height of the structure relative to the original dwelling, which was deemed overdevelopment on a restrictive site. The planning authority concluded that the pro...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.