Core Planning Reasoning
The first-floor extension was excluded via condition because it failed to meet the minimum 22-metre separation distance required by Objective DMS28, leading to unacceptable overlooking and visual overbearance of the property to the rear.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed first-floor extension would result in a separation distance of approximately 20.4 metres, which is below the 22-metre minimum standard set out in Objective DMS28.
- The extension would cause significant negative impacts on the residential amenity of No. 61 Alder Court through overlooking and visual overbearance.
- The imposition of Condition No. 2(a) is necessary and reasonable to ensure the development accords with local planning provisions and the proper planning of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Fingal Development Plan 2017-2023Objective DMS28Objective PM46Objective DMS42Chapter 3 (Section 3.4)Chapter 12 (Extensions to dwellings)RS Zoning
Decision Document Summary
This report concerns a first-party appeal against Condition 2(a) of a planning grant for works at 59A Blackthorn Close, Portmarnock. The development included a first-floor side/rear extension, an attic dormer, and boundary wall replacements. The Planning Authority granted permission but required the omission of the first-floor extension to protect neighboring privacy. The site is a detached dwelling on a constrained plot formerly serving as a side garden. The Inspector agreed with the Planning A...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.