Core Refusal Reason
The Inspector recommended that permission be granted (overturning the Planning Authority's refusal), concluding that the proposed dormer extensions are of appropriate scale, do not exceed the existing ridge height, and would not seriously injure the visual or residential amenities of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development is acceptable in principle under the 'RS' residential zoning and its scale and design do not overwhelm or dominate the original form of the existing dwelling.
- The extensions comply with Objective DMS41 of the County Development Plan as they do not exceed the existing ridge height and do not adversely impact the privacy of neighboring properties.
- While visible from public areas, the visual impact of the side and rear dormers is not considered significant enough to warrant a refusal or a requirement for redesign.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Fingal Development Plan 2017-2023RS Zoning ObjectiveObjective DMS41Objective DMS44Section 5.3 Extensions to Dwellings
Decision Document Summary
This report assesses a first-party appeal by Elaine and Ian Duncan against Fingal County Council's decision to refuse permission for a rear and side dormer roof extension at 5 Onward Walk, Portmarnock. The local authority had refused the application on the grounds that the extensions would be visually dominant, contravene objectives DMS41 and DMS44 regarding residential character, and set an undesirable precedent. The site comprises a detached two-storey dwelling in a low-density residential are...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.