Core Reason for the Refused Part
The retention of the rear flat roof extension was refused due to its excessive scale and bulk, which resulted in an overbearing and visually obtrusive impact on the neighboring property to the west.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The rear extension's scale and bulk are considered visually obtrusive and overbearing when viewed from the adjacent property at No. 92 Landscape Park.
- The development is deemed injurious to the residential and visual amenities of the area and is likely to depreciate the value of neighboring properties.
- The proposal specifically contravenes Section 8.2.3.4 (i) of the Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Development Plan 2016-2022 regarding standards for extensions.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.4 (i)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought permission and retention permission for developments at 94 Landscape Park, Churchtown, Dublin 14. While the local authority granted permission for certain elements of the proposal, it issued a split decision refusing the retention of a single-storey flat roof rear extension. The refusal was primarily based on the structure's negative impact on the neighboring property to the west, citing its overbearing nature and non-compliance with the Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Deve...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.