Core Planning Reasoning
The proposed development is consistent with the residential zoning objective 'RES' and would not seriously injure the residential or visual amenities of the area or of property in the vicinity, provided it complies with specific conditions regarding floor levels and use.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The design and materials of the side extension are consistent with the existing house, while the contemporary rear extension is acceptable given its screened location.
- No significant negative impact on the residential amenity of adjoining properties (No. 36 and No. 40) is anticipated regarding privacy, sunlight, or overbearing appearance.
- Flood risk concerns were adequately addressed; the development is classified as minor and will not obstruct flood paths, with finished floor levels conditioned to be above the 1 in 100-year flood level.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective RESSection 2.4.1Policy H18Section 11.3.3South Dublin County Council House Extension Guide (2010)
Decision Document Summary
This report assesses a third-party appeal against the grant of permission for a first-floor side extension and a single-storey rear extension at 38 Whitehall Road, Dublin 12. Neighbors raised objections concerning the potential for increased flooding, loss of light, and loss of privacy. The Inspector noted the site is partially within Flood Zone A due to the River Poddle but determined the project is 'minor development' where the justification test does not apply. Key arguments favored the appli...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.