3776/21

Planning permission for retention, upgrading and refurbishment of the existing 4 storey building and its change of use (including an extended basement) from retail/office to tourist hostel accommodation and associated ancillary facilities. The proposal will involve the demolition of the rear 2 storey annex building and replacement with a 9 storey building with additional roof plant structure to accommodate a 35 bedroom hostel with a basement consisting of a restaurant bar, kitchen and utilities and a ground floor consisting of reception, lobby area and bedroom accommodation with further accommodation on upper 8 floors. The proposal will include drainage works and all associated site development works.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal constitutes overdevelopment and visual intrusion that negatively impacts the skyline and character of a sensitive urban location.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development would result in significant visual intrusion and a detrimental impact on the skyline and heritage of the inner city.
  • The proposal represents an overdevelopment of the site that is incompatible with the established character of the surrounding area.
  • Granting permission would set an undesirable precedent and depreciate the value of property in the vicinity.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy SC7Policy SC25

Decision Document Summary

The application sought planning permission for the retention, upgrading, and refurbishment of an existing structure at 13 Trinity Street and St. Andrew's Lane, Dublin 2. The local authority refused the proposal primarily due to its prominent and sensitive location, citing concerns over visual obtrusiveness and poor design quality. It was determined that the development would constitute overdevelopment, fail to protect the city's skyline, and conflict with the Dublin City Development Plan 2016-20...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.