Core Refusal Reason
The proposed ATM installation on Protected Structures within a Conservation Area is visually obtrusive and detrimental to the architectural character and sensitive streetscape.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development would be visually obtrusive and injurious to the character and amenities of a sensitive streetscape involving Protected Structures.
- The proposal is located within a Conservation Area and would negatively impact the traditional shopfront and architectural integrity of the buildings.
- Granting permission would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2016-2022
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involved the installation of an ATM into the traditional shopfront of 24/25 Parliament Street, Dublin 2, which are designated Protected Structures situated within a Conservation Area. Dublin City Council refused the application because the addition was considered visually obtrusive and harmful to the character and amenities of the historic streetscape. The decision noted that the development would contravene the Dublin City Development Plan 2016-2022 and establish an undesirable pre...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.