21613

install lift within Capard House, Capard House Demesne, Rosenallis, Co. Laois, R32 VH70. Capard House is a 'Protected Structure' (RPS Ref: 434_A, B, C). The proposed development consists of:- 1) careful removal of 19th Century concrete and stone floor to form an aperture for the ground floor - first floor (two-stop) platform lift to include structural trims to floor, 2) removal of sections of 'later' plastered brickwork arched wine racks, 3) re-configuration of upper-floor accommodation local to the lift enclosure (small storage room (later WC)), 4) installation of platform lift (no requirement for machine room overhead or crouch space underneath), using existing ground-floor foor ope for new lift door ope and formation of new opening for lift door at (locally reconfigured) partitions at first-floor level, 5) associated redecoration and completion works. Applicant: Capard House

No decision recorded

Core Planning Reasoning

Failure to justify the necessity of an additional large garage and failure to address unauthorized boundary works that breached previous planning conditions.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The applicant failed to provide sufficient justification for the requirement of an additional 70sqm detached garage on a residential site that already features an existing 50sqm garage.
  • The applicant failed to satisfactorily address or regularize unauthorized works involving the removal of a roadside hedgerow and its replacement with a timber panel fence, which was in direct breach of parent permission P15/567.
  • The proposed development would facilitate and consolidate existing unauthorized works on-site, making it contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Decision Document Summary

The applicant, Paddy Holden, sought planning permission for a 50sqm detached home office and a 70sqm three-bay garage at a rural site in Pottlerath, Co. Kilkenny. The site is already served by a dwelling and an existing 50sqm garage. Kilkenny County Council refused the application primarily because the applicant failed to justify the need for a second, larger garage and failed to rectify unauthorized boundary treatments that violated the conditions of the original parent permission. Consequently...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.