Core Refusal Reason
The proposed 24m lattice tower would have a significantly increased and detrimental visual impact on the designated Summerhill Architectural Conservation Area (ACA) due to its scale, bulk, and inappropriate design for an urban context.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposal for a replacement lattice structure of increased scale and bulk would result in an unacceptable visual impact at a prominent urban location within an Architectural Conservation Area.
- The development is contrary to Section 4.2 of the national Telecommunications Antennae and Support Structures Guidelines, which recommends monopoles over lattice structures in urban settings.
- While technical justification for improved coverage exists, the chosen design fails to protect the character and setting of the Summerhill ACA and contravenes Development Plan policies HER POL 19 and HER POL 20.
Cited Policies (CDP)
INF POL 54INF POL 55INF POL 56INF POL 57INF POL 58INF POL 59INF POL 60INF OBJ 51INF OBJ 52INF OBJ 53HER POL 19HER POL 20CH OBJ 21EC POL 37
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks permission for a 24m multi-operator lattice tower (25.5m overall) to replace existing 13m/5m telecommunications infrastructure at the Eir Exchange on Main Street, Summerhill, Co. Meath. The site is located in the heart of the village and within the Summerhill Architectural Conservation Area (ACA). Meath County Council originally refused permission citing visual obtrusiveness and lack of co-location justification. On appeal, the Inspector acknowledged the technical need for ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.