Core Refusal Reason
The Inspector recommended granting permission, concluding that the demolition of the existing mid-20th-century bungalow is justified as it lacks architectural merit and its replacement with a high-quality, energy-efficient dwelling is a sustainable outcome that respects the character of the Candidate Architectural Conservation Area (cACA) and the residential amenities of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The existing 1970s bungalow is of no architectural heritage or merit, and the Inspector found that the applicant provided sufficient justification for its demolition based on structural limitations and energy efficiency requirements.
- The proposed contemporary two-storey dwelling is of a design, scale, and form that responds appropriately to the character of the streetscape and the Booterstown Avenue Candidate Architectural Conservation Area without negatively affecting the adjacent Protected Structure.
- The development would not seriously injure the residential amenities of adjoining properties by way of overlooking, overshadowing, or being visually overbearing, and is consistent with the 'A' zoning objective to protect and/or improve residential amenity.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.4(xiv)Section 12.3.9Policy AR17Section 12.3.7Section 6.1.3Section 6.1.4.5 (Policy AR16)Section 8.2.3.1Section 8.3.2.4 (vii)Section 8.2.11.2 (iii)Policy Objective CA6Policy Objective PHP19Policy Objectives HER20Policy Objectives HER21
Decision Document Summary
This report pertains to a first-party appeal against Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council's decision to refuse permission for the demolition of a 101 sq.m. single-storey bungalow and the construction of a 328 sq.m. two-storey house at 70a Booterstown Avenue. The Planning Authority originally refused permission on the grounds that a strong justification for the demolition of a structurally sound dwelling had not been provided. The site is a 0.061 ha plot located within a Candidate Architectural ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP