WEB5149/21

The development will consist of the partial demolition of the existing rear wall and roof, and the erection of a part first-floor, part two-storey extension to the rear of the existing terraced dwelling house, including one new rooflight at ground floor level and two new rooflights at first floor level.

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The Inspector recommended granting permission but with revised conditions requiring a 1.5-metre reduction in the depth of the first-floor extension and a significant reduction in the size of rear windows to prevent visual obtrusion and protect the residential amenities of adjacent properties from undue overlooking.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed first-floor extension is excessive in massing and proportion, which would negatively impact the character and integrity of the mews and the wider residential conservation area.
  • The proposed full-length rear-facing windows would result in an unacceptable level of overlooking and perceived overlooking of the private open spaces and rear windows of neighboring houses on Leinster Road.
  • The requirements for a 1.5-metre depth reduction and the modification of window sizes/cill heights are warranted to ensure the development does not seriously injure the visual or residential amenities of the area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zoning Objective Z2Section 16.5Policy Objective CHC4Section 11.1.5.4Policy Objective QH 8Section 16.10.2Section 16.10.3Section 16.10.16Section 17.2Appendix 17

Decision Document Summary

This report concerns a first-party appeal against conditions attached to a grant of permission for a two-storey rear extension at No. 49 Grosvenor Lane, Rathmines. The site is a mews-style dwelling located within a 'Z2' Residential Conservation Area at the rear of Leinster Road. The Planning Authority (Dublin City Council) granted permission subject to Condition 2, which required a 1.5m reduction in depth and reduced window sizes to prevent overlooking and overbearing impact. The applicant argue...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP