Core Reason for the Refused Part
The refusal centers on the overdevelopment of the site, specifically the excessive massing and overbearing nature of a proposed three-storey infill unit and the bulky design of a rear dormer extension.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed three-storey infill unit constitutes overdevelopment due to its massing and siting, which would adversely impact adjacent residential amenities through an overbearing appearance and insufficient separation distances.
- The rear dormer extension is excessive in dimension and bulk relative to the terraced building, failing to meet development plan standards for roof extensions.
- The application provided insufficient and conflicting technical details regarding external finishes and balcony screening, preventing a full assessment of the impact on residential and visual amenity.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.4(i)Section 8.2.8.4(i)Section 8.2.8.4(ii)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought permission for development at 17 Georges Street Lower and Brucks Lane, Dun Laoghaire, featuring a rear dormer extension and a new three-storey infill residential unit. The Planning Authority issued a split decision, granting permission for the main building works subject to the omission of the infill unit. The refusal of the infill unit and the criticism of the dormer were based on concerns regarding overdevelopment, excessive massing, and negative impacts on the residential ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.