Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority initially refused permission on the grounds that the proposed dormer was excessively sized, lacked appropriate setbacks, and would create an overbearing impact on neighboring residential amenities. However, the Inspector overturned this, recommending a grant of permission as the design is in keeping with the house's character and does not significantly increase overlooking.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The principle of the proposed development is acceptable as it is located within a zone designated to protect and improve residential amenities.
- The design and materials of the proposed rear dormer mirror existing front-facing elements, ensuring architectural harmony with the terrace.
- Central positioning and the setting of the dormer below the ridge level effectively minimize visual scale and prevent any new overlooking issues for adjacent properties.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.4(i) (2016-2022 Plan)Section 12.3.7.1(iv) (2022-2028 Plan)Objective A Residential zoning
Decision Document Summary
This report pertains to a First Party appeal against the refusal of planning permission for a rear dormer window at 24 Larkfield Heath, Clay Farm, Dublin 18. The subject site is a modern three-storey end-of-terrace dwelling. The Planning Authority's refusal was based on the dormer's scale and perceived overbearing nature. The Inspector, however, argued that the dormer is appropriately designed to reflect the front elevation and is positioned to maintain separation from neighboring roof windows. ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP