Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority initially refused permission citing traffic hazard concerns due to the entrance's location on a curved radii; however, the Inspector recommended granting permission, concluding that the proposal would not result in a traffic hazard or obstruction given the 30kph speed limit and adequate sightlines.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed 3-metre wide vehicular entrance provides adequate sightlines and sight stopping distances for both pedestrians and motorists in a low-speed (30kph) residential environment.
- The development does not conflict with Section 16.38 of the City Development Plan as it will not result in a loss of on-street parking and is consistent with the existing pattern of development on Vernon Grove.
- The proposal is in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area, provided conditions such as inward-opening gates are implemented.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Zoning Z1Policy MT14Section 16.38Appendix 5Guidance document 'Parking Cars in Front Gardens'
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission for a new vehicular access and off-street parking at 1a Vernon Grove, Clontarf, a corner property. Dublin City Council refused the application on traffic safety grounds, specifically regarding potential conflict at the curved junction radii. Upon appeal, the Inspector evaluated the site's context, noting that the majority of neighboring properties already possess vehicular access. The Inspector's assessment, supported by auto track analysis, found that the light t...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
View the appeal at An Bord Pleanála