21704

for the development consisting of the partial change of use from commercial (licenced premises/public house) to residential comprising 1 no. 1 bedroom apartment at ground floor, 1 no. 1 bedroom apartment at first floor. The proposed construction of 2 no. 1 bedroom apartments at first floor, 2 no. 1 bedroom apartments at second floor and 2 no. 1 bedroom apartments on third floor. Works will comprise of select demolition works and reconfiguration of the existing structure with modification to existing facades, the construction of an extension and all associated site works.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

Overdevelopment of the site resulting in an over-dominating presence and significant negative impact on the residential amenity of adjoining properties through overshadowing and loss of privacy.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed design, scale, and height constitute overdevelopment, creating an over-dominating presence that would cause overshadowing, overlooking, and loss of light to adjacent residential properties.
  • The application failed to provide adequate details regarding floor areas, private/communal amenity space, and bin storage, and the proposed ground floor window for apartment no. 1 was deemed substandard.
  • The development would seriously injure the amenities of the area, depreciate property values, and fails to integrate properly with the existing site setting and surrounding environment.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zoning: General Business [M5]POL 1.19POL 1.1.6National Policy Objective 2aNational Policy Objective 3bNational Policy Objective 13Specific Planning Policy Requirement 1Specific Planning Policy Requirement 2Specific Planning Policy Requirement 3Specific Planning Policy Requirement 4Specific Planning Policy Requirement 5Specific Planning Policy Requirement 6

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought the partial change of use of Doyles Bar at No. 64 Barrack Street, Waterford, from a public house to a residential development comprising 8 one-bedroom apartments across four storeys, including a rear extension. Located in a 'General Business' zoned area, the application was refused as the scale and height were considered an overdevelopment of the site, leading to an overbearing impact on neighboring residential properties. Furthermore, the planning authority noted a lack of s...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.