Core Refusal Reason
The application was refused due to the applicant's failure to demonstrate that the existing wastewater treatment system is suitable for the proposed development and that the site entrance provides safe visibility sightlines for traffic.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant failed to provide a site characterisation report or technical assessment to prove the existing septic tank can adequately manage wastewater for the proposed extension in accordance with the 2021 EPA Code of Practice.
- The proposed site entrance arrangement, featuring adjoining gated entrances, does not demonstrate the required unobstructed visibility sightlines, posing a risk to traffic safety on the local tertiary road.
- Insufficient information was submitted regarding the overall site layout and boundary treatments, preventing a full assessment of the development's impact on the visual and residential amenities of the rural area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Chapter 4 - Section 4.1.3Chapter 4 - Section 4.2Chapter 4 - Section 4.3Chapter 4 - Section 4.3.2Chapter 9 - Section 9.9
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought permission for the extension and refurbishment of an existing 86sqm single-storey dwelling and the temporary retention of a mobile home on a 0.393-hectare site at Runnabackan, Ballinaheglish, Co. Roscommon. While the principle of a house extension is supported under Section 9.9 of the County Development Plan, the application was refused because the applicant did not address critical public health and safety concerns. Specifically, there was no evidence that the existing waste...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.