WEB1033/22

The development will consist of the demolition of the existing single storey side extension and portions of rear wall; the construction of a single storey rear/side extension; a single storey front porch extension; skylights to the rear and side; external wall insulation to existing house; and associated works.

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The Inspector recommended the omission of Condition No. 3, concluding that external wall insulation on the front facade would not significantly harm the visual amenities or character of the residential conservation area, particularly given the existing variety of altered finishes in the vicinity.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The Inspector found that while the area has cultural significance, the visual impact of external wall insulation would not be detrimental enough to warrant refusal of permission.
  • Site inspection revealed that many surrounding properties have already been altered with various renders, pebble dash, and extensions, meaning the original architectural uniformity is already diminished.
  • The proposed development aligns with the zoning objectives of the City Development Plan and constitutes proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Dublin City Development Plan 2016-2022Objective Z2Appendix 24

Decision Document Summary

The proposal involves the demolition of a side extension and the construction of new side/rear extensions, a front porch, and external wall insulation at a semi-detached dwelling in Killester. The site is located within a 'Residential Conservation Area' (Objective Z2) comprising an interwar-era planned estate. Dublin City Council granted permission but included a condition (No. 3) requiring the omission of front-facing external insulation to protect the area's character. The applicant appealed t...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP