Core Refusal Reason
The Inspector recommends granting permission, overturning the local authority's refusal, on the basis that the proposal provides for a necessary intensification of an infill site in line with Policy Objective PHP18, while maintaining the residential amenities and the character of the surrounding Foxrock Architectural Conservation Area through specific design modifications.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development complies with national and local policies regarding residential density, compact growth, and the provision of a diverse housing mix on suburban infill lands.
- Potential negative impacts on residential amenities, such as overlooking and overbearing, are deemed acceptable given the separation distances and the retention of mature screening, supplemented by a recommended condition to reduce the height of Block B by one floor.
- The loss of mature trees is considered justifiable to achieve higher density development near quality public transport corridors, provided that the remaining sylvan character is protected and managed via bond and specialist consultancy.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.3Policy AR12Policy Objective PHP18Policy Objective PHP20Policy Objective PHP27Policy Objective PHP42Policy Objective HER13Policy Objective HER20Policy Objective HER21Section 12.3.5.2Section 12.8.3Section 12.8.11Section 12.3.9Appendix 5 (Building Height Strategy)Policy LHB19Policy AR8Section 8.2.3.4
Decision Document Summary
The applicant, Macro Properties North West Ltd., proposed the demolition of two large detached houses, 'Tinnahinch' and 'Larch Grove', to construct 99 apartments (initially 3 to 6 storeys) on a 0.986-hectare site in Foxrock, Dublin 18. The site is notable for its mature tree coverage and proximity to the Foxrock Architectural Conservation Area (ACA). Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council initially refused permission due to concerns over scale, massing, height, and the loss of 73 trees. However, ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP