Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed two-storey side extension would result in the permanent removal of all on-site car parking provision, which would exacerbate pressure on existing shared car parking facilities, contribute to haphazard parking practices, and create a traffic hazard in an area already experiencing high parking demand.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The retention of the single-storey rear extension is considered appropriate as it does not seriously injure the visual or residential amenities of the area.
- The total loss of off-street parking for the dwelling is unacceptable given the observed high pressure on communal parking spaces and the resulting haphazard parking practices in the estate.
- Granting permission for the side extension would set an undesirable precedent for the removal of on-site parking on similar sites, contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
RES: Existing ResidentialPolicy QDP1QDP1 Objective 1Policy H14H14 Objective 1H14 Objective 2Policy SM7SM7 Objective 1Section 12.5Section 12.6.7Section 12.6.8Section 12.7.4Table 12.26
Decision Document Summary
The application relates to 34 Griffeen Glen Boulevard, Lucan, involving a split proposal: the retention of a single-storey rear utility extension and the construction of a new two-storey side extension. The site is located in a residential area characterized by a mix of semi-detached housing and perimeter blocks. While the Inspector found the rear extension acceptable, the side extension was scrutinized regarding its impact on parking. The property originally had two off-street spaces; one was l...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.