3305/22

Planning permission for removal of an existing garage and construction of a single storey outbuilding for purposes incidental to the enjoyment of the house (approx. 65 sqm), and a car port and storage shed (approx. 3.2 sq m. ) all to the front of the property, and for associated alterations to paving/landscaping and new boundary wall with 1 Blackheath Grove.

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The Inspector recommended a grant of permission, concluding that the proposed domestic outbuildings and car port are compatible with the visual and residential amenities of the area, do not conflict with car parking standards in a way that generates new issues, and would not negatively impact the site's sylvan character or drainage infrastructure.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The outbuildings are of a low-slung, modern design that is sympathetic to the eclectic and self-contained character of the cul-de-sac.
  • The proposed car port facilitates the storage of an existing vehicle collection and does not represent a material intensification of parking or traffic use.
  • The sylvan character of the site will be maintained provided that existing hedgerows are protected during construction and a proposed new boundary wall is omitted.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zoning Z15Section 16.2.1Section 16.2.1.1Section 16.10.8Section 16.10.12Section 16.38.7Section 16.38.9

Decision Document Summary

This report evaluates a third-party appeal against Dublin City Council's decision to grant permission for development at 2 Blackheath Grove, Clontarf. The proposal involves removing an existing garage to construct a single-storey outbuilding (65 sqm) for use as a home office, art studio, and gym, alongside a new car port and storage shed. The site is a 853 sqm plot at the end of a private cul-de-sac. Appellants from the neighboring property (No. 1) expressed concerns regarding the loss of the 's...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP