Core Refusal Reason
Overdevelopment of the site resulting in substandard residential amenity.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development proposed for retention, when combined with existing significant ground floor rear extensions, constitutes overdevelopment of the subject site.
- The proposal results in a substandard level of residential amenity for the occupants, failing to meet established quality housing standards.
- The development is contrary to the 2016-2022 Dublin City Development Plan and national guidelines for sustainable communities and proper planning.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 16.10
Decision Document Summary
This application sought retention permission for an existing structure at 38 Brian Boru Avenue, Clontarf, Dublin 3. The local authority refused the proposal on the grounds that the cumulative scale of the development, alongside existing rear extensions, represents overdevelopment of the site. It was determined that the proposal fails to provide adequate residential amenity, thereby violating Section 16.10 of the Dublin City Development Plan 2016-2022 and the DoEHLG’s 2007 Quality Housing for Sus...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.