Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed rear roof expansion was refused due to its excessive scale and design, which was deemed overbearing and visually incongruous, negatively impacting the residential and visual amenity of adjoining properties.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The design and scale of the rear extension would significantly detract from existing residential and visual amenity by appearing overbearing to adjoining properties.
- The proposed rear roof level expansion is visually incongruous and inconsistent with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
- The development fails to comply with the specific standards for dwelling extensions set out in Section 8.2.3.4(i) of the Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Development Plan 2016-2022.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 8.2.3.4(i)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involved the construction of a dormer extension and attic conversion at 59 Marley Court, Rathfarnham. The local authority issued a split decision, granting permission for the front dormer and roof light retention but refusing the rear roof level expansion. The refusal was primarily based on the conclusion that the rear element's scale would negatively impact the amenity of neighboring residents and fail to harmonize with the existing visual context, leading to a condition requiring ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.