SD22A/0063

(1) The demolition of the existing shed/garage building to the rear of the existing dwelling; (2) the construction of 1 2-bedroom, 3 person detached single storey pitched roof mews dwelling with attic conversion, and a single storey flat roof rear projection located to the rear of the existing dwelling and fronting Brideswell Lane; (3) the vehicular entrance is off Brideswell Lane; (4) connection to all public services; (5) all necessary ancillary site development works to facilitate this development.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The Inspector recommended overturning the Planning Authority's refusal, concluding that the proposal constitutes appropriate infill development on a serviced brownfield site that aligns with compact growth policies and will not negatively impact traffic safety or residential amenity.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development represents an efficient use of residential-zoned brownfield land, fulfilling national and local policy objectives for compact urban growth and consolidation.
  • The removal of the existing commercial vehicle repair business will likely reduce traffic intensity and informal parking congestion on Brideswell Lane, representing a net improvement to the local environment.
  • The proposed dwelling's scale, height, and orientation are consistent with the character of the area and will not result in significant overshadowing or loss of privacy for neighboring residents.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 11.3.2(iii)RES Zoning ObjectivePolicy H13H13 Objective 2Section 6.8Section 12.6.8TM7 Objective 3

Decision Document Summary

This report concerns a First Party appeal against South Dublin County Council's decision to refuse permission for a two-storey detached dwelling at 97 Boot Road, Clondalkin. The project involves demolishing an existing commercial garage and constructing a house with frontage onto Brideswell Lane. The Planning Authority's refusal focused on the 'piecemeal' nature of the development and the lack of pedestrian infrastructure on the lane. However, the Inspector argued that the proposal is a high-qua...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.