D22A/0142

Retention permission of 295 sq. m. roof canopy

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The Inspector recommended a grant of permission as the proposed development, including the retention of a canopy and the revision of operating hours, is considered a minor alteration on industrial-zoned land that would not adversely impact the residential amenity of adjacent properties or the character of the surrounding area.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The 295 sq. m. roof canopy is a minor development that serves to protect workers from the elements and helps suppress noise from HGV loading operations.
  • Site inspections during maximum production levels confirmed that the laundry operation does not result in significant noise, dust, or odor emissions that would be detrimental to neighboring residential amenity.
  • The proposed extension of production and HGV operating hours is acceptable within the context of a transitional urban zone and is in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Objective E (Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Development Plan 2022 – 2028)Section 13.1.2 Transitional Zonal AreasSection 12.9.3 Noise, Odour and Vibration

Decision Document Summary

The application by Elis Textile Services Limited seeks retention for a roof canopy and permission to extend operating hours (including Saturday production and earlier weekday HGV movements) at an existing commercial laundry facility in Dun Laoghaire Industrial Estate. The site occupies a transitional zone immediately adjacent to residential properties at Clonkeen Crescent. Despite third-party appeals regarding noise and environmental nuisance, the Inspector's assessment—which included visits to ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP