Core Refusal Reason
Failure to meet statutory requirements for an extension of duration regarding the commencement of development and the completion of substantial works within the original permission period.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The Planning Authority was not satisfied that the development commenced before the expiration of the original appropriate period as required by Section 42(1)(a)(i)(I) of the Planning and Development Act.
- There was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during the appropriate period as required by Section 42(1)(a)(i)(III).
- The application failed to fulfill the mandatory legal criteria necessary to grant an extension of duration for the permitted ridge height increase.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for planning permission D16B/0320, which involved increasing the ridge height of a split-level bungalow at 21 Roebuck Road, Clonskeagh, Dublin 14. The Planning Authority refused the request because the applicant failed to prove that the development had legally commenced or that substantial physical works had been undertaken before the original permission expired. Consequently, the proposal did not meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of t...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.