Core Planning Reasoning
The appeal concerned a condition-only challenge regarding a rear dormer and roof lights; the Inspector determined that the restrictions on the dormer's width and height, and the omission of front roof lights, were unnecessary as the development would not negatively impact visual or residential amenity.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- Requiring the dormer to be set down 300mm below the roof ridge is unnecessary because, as proposed, it remains below the ridgeline and will not be visible from the front of the house.
- The front-facing roof lights are a standard feature in residential areas for attic conversions and will not seriously injure the visual or residential amenity of the area.
- The restrictions imposed by the Planning Authority would unreasonably diminish the internal utility of the attic conversion while providing no significant additional protection to the visual or residential amenity of the neighborhood.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective DMS41Objective DMS42Objective DMS28Fingal County Development Plan 2017-2023
Decision Document Summary
The development at 4 Deerhaven Avenue, Clonee, consists of an attic conversion featuring a flat-roofed rear dormer and two front-facing roof lights. While Fingal County Council granted permission, they attached Condition 2, which sought to limit the dormer's width to 3m, lower its height by 300mm, and omit the front roof lights to prevent visual dominance. The applicant appealed this specific condition, arguing that the height restriction would render the internal space unviable (1720mm height)....SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.