Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed rear and dormer extensions were refused due to visual overbearance on neighboring property, inappropriate design and bulk of the dormer, and an unacceptable reduction in private open space.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The rear extension's height and depth would result in visual overbearance, adversely impacting the residential amenity of the adjacent property to the southwest.
- The proposed dormer extension is disproportionate in design, dimensions, and bulk relative to the existing dwelling and roof profile, failing to meet attic alteration standards.
- The overall development would lead to a deficient quantum of private open space to serve the dwelling, contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.3.7.1 (ii)Section 12.3.7.1 (iv)Objective A
Decision Document Summary
The application proposed extensions to the front and rear, along with a dormer extension, at 117 Pearse Park, Sallynoggin. The Planning Authority issued a split decision, granting permission for the front extension but refusing the rear and roof elements. The refusal was grounded in the rear extension's overbearing impact on the southwestern neighbor, the excessive scale of the dormer relative to the host dwelling, and the resulting loss of adequate private open space, all of which were deemed c...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.