D22A/0183

Permission developmet will consist of : restoration and upgrade works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

While the Planning Authority initially refused permission due to impacts on the Dalkey Architectural Conservation Area (ACA), the Inspector recommends a grant of permission subject to conditions. The core justification is that the proposed restoration and extension, when modified to omit a specific first-floor element, will integrate successfully with the existing structure and the character of the ACA without causing visual injury.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The restoration and upgrade of the existing dilapidated dwelling is welcome in principle and aligns with the residential uses permitted under the 'NC' zoning objective.
  • Potential negative visual impacts on the Dalkey ACA can be effectively mitigated by a condition requiring the omission of the proposed first-floor master bedroom, reducing the extension's depth by 4.6 metres.
  • The modified development would provide a satisfactory level of residential amenity for future occupiers and would not adversely affect the heritage or urban morphology of the surrounding area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy Objective HER13: Architectural Conservation AreasSection 12.11.4: New Development within an ACASection 12.3.7.1: Extensions to DwellingsZoning Objective 'NC'Chapter 11: Heritage & Conservation

Decision Document Summary

The application relates to 59a Castle Street, Dalkey, an end-of-terrace single-storey dwelling within an Architectural Conservation Area (ACA). The applicant sought permission for extensive restoration works, including the demolition of rear extensions and the construction of a new two-storey extension with a dormer. The Planning Authority refused the application, citing a failure to respect the character and urban morphology of the ACA. However, the Inspector argues that the site has the capaci...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP