Core Refusal Reason
The Inspector recommended granting permission (reversing the initial refusal) on the basis that the development would integrate satisfactorily with the existing dwelling and surroundings, would not negatively impact the character or heritage of the Dalkey Architectural Conservation Area (ACA), and would not injure residential or visual amenities.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development integrates satisfactorily with the existing mid-terrace dwelling and surrounding properties without being visually incongruous or dominant within the Dalkey ACA.
- The subject site is considered less sensitive than the adjoining property, and the proposed rear extensions will not be unduly visible from Castle Street, ensuring the built heritage of the area is protected.
- The proposal successfully balances the need for modern residential standards with heritage conservation, addressing drainage and transportation concerns through enforceable planning conditions.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy Objective HER13: Architectural Conservation AreasSection 12.11.4: New Development within an ACASection 12.3.7.1: Extensions to DwellingsZoning Objective NC
Decision Document Summary
This report concerns a First Party appeal against Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council's decision to refuse permission for the restoration and extension of 59B Castle Street, Dalkey. The site consists of a mid-terrace single-storey dwelling within the Dalkey Architectural Conservation Area (ACA). The proposed development involves the demolition of dilapidated sheds and a rear extension to facilitate a new two-storey extension and dormer. While the Planning Authority initially refused the applic...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP