Core Refusal Reason
The proposed development constitutes over-development of a constrained site, providing insufficient car parking (13 spaces versus a requirement of 31) which would lead to traffic over-spill, and would negatively impact the setting of a Protected Structure (St. Stephen's Church) and the residential amenities of the area through overlooking and loss of privacy.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The quantum of car parking provided (13 spaces) falls far short of the Development Plan requirement (31 spaces) for Zone 3, and given the site's lack of proximity to high-frequency public transport, would lead to undesirable over-spill onto surrounding roads.
- The proximity of the new apartment block to St. Stephen's Church and the existing 'Mount Auburn' villa results in inadequate separation distances, leading to significant overlooking, loss of privacy, and a detrimental impact on the setting of a Protected Structure.
- The proposed felling of numerous mature trees on-site, and the requirement to remove additional trees in adjacent public open space for new sewer connections, runs counter to the Development Plan objective to preserve trees and would injure the visual amenities of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective APolicy Objective PHP28Section 12.3.6Section 12.3.8.1Table 12.5Section 12.4.5.6Section 12.4.5.2Section 12.8.3Section 12.8.8To protect and preserve trees and woodlands (Map Objective)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought a specialised 'later living' Build-to-Rent (BTR) development of 29 apartments (revised to 28 during appeal) at 'Mount Auburn', Killiney Hill Road. The scheme involved the construction of a new four-storey block and the refurbishment/change-of-use of an existing 19th-century villa. While the Planning Authority originally refused permission based solely on a BTR policy requiring proximity to high-frequency transport, the Inspector identified broader systemic issues with the des...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP