Core Refusal Reason
The proposal was refused due to substandard design and layout, adverse impacts on residential amenity through overlooking, and insufficient technical information regarding environmental management and surface water drainage.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The design and layout are substandard due to inadequate public open space (less than 10%), poor infrastructure for parking and lighting, and a lack of functional amenity areas.
- Unit 1 poses a significant threat to the privacy of neighboring residents through direct overlooking from upper-floor windows into adjoining private residences.
- The application failed to provide essential technical details concerning environmental management (CEMP) and surface water disposal systems, posing risks to public health and the environment.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought permission for an infill residential development at Glen (Richards), Ardamine. The proposal was refused by the local authority primarily because the layout failed to meet minimum standards for public open space and essential infrastructure, such as visitor parking, EV charging, and public lighting. Additionally, the design of Unit 1 was found to negatively impact the privacy of adjacent properties through overlooking. Finally, the applicant provided insufficient informati...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.