Core Refusal Reason
Failure to meet the statutory criteria under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended), specifically regarding the lack of substantial works completed.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The application does not satisfy the mandatory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) for an extension of duration.
- The Planning Authority determined that substantial works have not been carried out on the development during the original permission period.
- In the absence of evidence of significant physical progress on-site, the authority is legally unable to grant an extension to the life of the permission.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for a previously approved development (Ref: SD15B/0287) involving alterations and an increased side extension at 1 Wheatfield Crescent, Clondalkin. The Planning Authority refused the extension because the applicant failed to demonstrate that substantial works had been completed on the site, which is a core requirement under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000. As the statutory criteria for progress were not met, the permission coul...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.