WEB1399/22

The demolition of existing single storey side extension and construction of new single storey side extension with rooflight, construction of an attic conversion to include a dormer roof window to the rear of the existing roof, also rooflights to the side and front of existing roof, and to include all associated site works.

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The Inspector recommended omitting Condition 2(a) and amending Condition 2(b), concluding that the proposed dormer width is acceptable and that a three-light window configuration better serves visual amenity than a direct match of ground floor dimensions.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • Condition 2(a) is unnecessary as reducing the dormer width would forfeit valuable attic space and create a skewed visual relationship with the ground floor window below.
  • Condition 2(b) should be amended to require three lights of equal width rather than matching the lower floor window, as this maintains a better solid-to-void ratio and reflects vertical emphasis seen elsewhere in the vicinity.
  • The proposed development, with the recommended modifications, is compatible with the visual amenities of the residential conservation area and accords with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Dublin City Development Plan 2016 – 2022Zoning Objective Z2Section 16.10.12Appendix 17Section 17.11

Decision Document Summary

This inspector's report evaluates a first-party appeal against specific conditions attached to a grant of permission for residential extensions and an attic conversion at 22 Abbeyfield, Killester. The site consists of a semi-detached cottage located within a residential conservation area (Zoning Z2). The primary dispute involves Condition 2, which sought to reduce the dormer window's width and modify its glazing pattern to match ground-floor windows. The Inspector found that the planning authori...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP